Sunday 22 November 2009

I have to ask ...

... when presented with 2 sets of facts and figures, that are identical in every way, would you say that they came from exactly the same item? That is something I've had to ask myself recently and, despite not wanting to have to admit it, the answer has had to be 'yes'. If the figures weren't so precise there could have been reason for doubt but there's not, as far as I can see.

1st set of figures -
Dimensions – 389 x 517
Width – 389 pixels
Height – 517 pixels
Horizontal Res – 100dpi
Vertical Res – 100dpi
Bit Depth – 24
Resolution Unit – 2
Color Representation – sRGB
Adobe photoshop 7.0
File Size 54kb


2nd set of figures -
Dimensions – 389 x 517
Width – 389 pixels
Height – 517 pixels
Horizontal Res – 100dpi
Vertical Res – 100dpi
Bit Depth – 24
Resolution Unit – 2
Color Representation – sRGB
Adobe photoshop 7.0
File Size 54kb


Where's the difference? There are other exact similarities as well which further add to the conclusion that these are figures from the same item but ... they were taken from the properties of 2 different sources. I know what conclusion I've come to, no matter how much I didn't want to. The object of these figures has been the cause of an almighty row and a totally unnecessary one. I think people have jumped in with both feet instead of looking at things more carefully before they did so but, to me, more shockingly is how vitriolic people have been (especially as, for once, I'm not the one on the receiving end *☺*). I've certainly seen a few in a different light - and not a very pleasant one at that. Disappointed? Yes, and appalled.


Thanks for dropping by .....

No comments: